Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 13:29

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What questions would you ask to an AI?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Final Fantasy 16 runs at 720p on Xbox Series X in performance mode - Video Games Chronicle
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
How do you feel about the impending end of what Donald Trump calls "the Green New scam"?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
49ers' Williams healthy, introspective in year 16 - ESPN
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All the ways Apple TV boxes do—and mostly don’t—track you - Ars Technica
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Reddit user surprised when 1960s computer panel emerged from collapsed family garage - Ars Technica